You are not a participant.

Stated purpose

Frames this as defending democratic accountability and the constitutional separation of powers, while preventing another Middle Eastern quagmire that drains resources from working families.

If implemented, advances interests of

Iranian Government (indirect) — If implemented, ending unauthorized strikes would remove the immediate military threat to the regime, regardless of AOC's intent - the constitutional process argument produces the same outcome Iran seeks for different reasons

European E3 (UK, France, Germany) (indirect) — If implemented, the demand for congressional deliberation and implicit support for non-military approaches would align with European preference for diplomatic solutions and multilateral frameworks on Iran

Hezbollah (indirect) — If implemented, ending US strikes on Iran would preserve Hezbollah's state patron and reduce the multi-front military pressure currently threatening the organization, even though this is entirely incidental to AOC's constitutional argument

Stated purpose

Frames this as supporting democracy and Ukrainian sovereignty while ensuring taxpayer money is spent accountably and diplomatic avenues are pursued alongside military aid.

If implemented, advances interests of

Ukrainian Government (indirect) — If implemented, continued but conditioned aid provides ongoing support for Ukraine's defense while introducing oversight requirements and diplomatic pressure that could constrain Ukraine's negotiating position

US Government (indirect) — If implemented, congressional oversight and conditions would reassert legislative authority over foreign military spending, constraining executive discretion but also providing democratic legitimacy to the aid program

NATO (indirect) — If implemented, continued US support for Ukraine reinforces NATO's collective security framework, though the conditions and diplomatic demands could introduce friction within the alliance over strategy

Stated purpose

Frames this as defending both the Venezuelan people's right to self-determination and Americans' right not to be sent into another imperial misadventure that benefits contractors while destroying lives.

If implemented, advances interests of

Venezuelan Government (Maduro Regime) (indirect) — If implemented, withdrawal of US military forces would remove the existential threat to the Maduro regime, even though AOC explicitly condemns Maduro's authoritarianism - the anti-intervention outcome structurally benefits regime survival

Venezuelan Democratic Opposition (indirect) — If implemented, ending military intervention while supporting non-military democratic mechanisms could preserve the opposition's domestic legitimacy, which risks being tainted by association with foreign invasion - but also removes the military pressure that some opposition figures believe is necessary for regime change

Russian Federation (indirect) — If implemented, US withdrawal from Venezuela would preserve Russia's strategic foothold in the Western Hemisphere and validate Russia's narrative that US military interventions are illegitimate acts of imperialism